American journal of otolaryngology · 2021
Comparison of efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic transcanal inlay butterfly cartilage myringoplasty.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ravi Nimisha, Meher Ravi, Rathore P K, Singh Ishwar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Butterfly cartilage myringoplasty has been widely practiced over two decades due to its simplicity and feasibility. The present study is aimed to compare the efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic transcanal inlay butterfly cartilage myringoplasty.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this randomised control trial, fifty patients with small to medium sized perforation were included. The first group underwent butterfly cartilage myringoplasty using endoscope and the second group using microscope and, outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Graft success rates in the endoscopic group was 96% ± 4% and in the microscopic group was 92% ± 8%. The improvement in the Air-Bone Gap was 11.00 ± 7.21 dB in the endoscopic group and 10.8 ± 7.59 dB in the microscopic group. The difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rates and hearing outcomes were similar in the endoscopic and microscopic group with added advantages of less pain, shorter operative time and better field of vision in the endoscopic group.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this randomised control trial, fifty patients with small to medium sized perforation were included. The first group underwent butterfly cartilage myringoplasty using endoscope and the second group using microscope and, outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: Graft success rates in the endoscopic group was 96% ± 4% and in the microscopic group was 92% ± 8%. The improvement in the Air-Bone Gap was 11.00 ± 7.21 dB in the endoscopic group and 10.8 ± 7.59 dB in the microscopic group. The difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rates and hearing outcomes were similar in the endoscopic and microscopic group with added advantages of less pain, shorter operative time and better field of vision in the endoscopic group.