The Clinical journal of pain · 2026
Item Reduction and Scoring of the Pediatric PainSCAN ©: A Screening Tool for Pediatric Neuropathic Pain and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mesaroli Giulia, Davis Aileen M, Perruccio Anthony V, Davidge Kristen M, Campbell Fiona, Sun Naiyi, Walker Suellen M, Hess Courtney W, Simons Laura E, Logan Deirdre, Stinson Jennifer N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The Pediatric PainSCAN© is the first screening tool specifically designed for pediatric neuropathic pain (NP) and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). A draft tool (37 items) was developed through a phased approach. This research aimed to reduce the number of items in the tool and to determine the weight of each item (ie, item scores) as it contributes to a probability of a diagnosis of NP or CRPS.
METHODS: Survey 1 was administered to patients with NP or CRPS and health care professionals (HCPs). Participants rated the frequency and importance of each item in the draft tool on a 0 to 4 Likert scale; highest rated items were retained. Survey 2 was administered to a separate pool of patients (with NP, CRPS, or other pain conditions) who completed the Pediatric PainSCAN©. A logistic regression model was used to examine the relationship between item responses (yes/no) and patient diagnosis; parameter estimates were used for item scores.
RESULTS: Survey 1 was completed by 43 patients (median age 15 y, 77% female) and 74 HCPs. Survey 2 was completed by 221 patients (median age 15 y, 81% female). Nineteen items remained in the final version of the tool; items were rated as important by patients and HCPs. Item scores are summed and converted to a probability score.
CONCLUSION: The final set of items in the Pediatric PainSCAN© has been determined and study results provide further evidence of content validity. Additional research is needed to evaluate the tool's reliability, criterion validity, and select a cutoff score.
METHODS: Survey 1 was administered to patients with NP or CRPS and health care professionals (HCPs). Participants rated the frequency and importance of each item in the draft tool on a 0 to 4 Likert scale; highest rated items were retained. Survey 2 was administered to a separate pool of patients (with NP, CRPS, or other pain conditions) who completed the Pediatric PainSCAN©. A logistic regression model was used to examine the relationship between item responses (yes/no) and patient diagnosis; parameter estimates were used for item scores.
RESULTS: Survey 1 was completed by 43 patients (median age 15 y, 77% female) and 74 HCPs. Survey 2 was completed by 221 patients (median age 15 y, 81% female). Nineteen items remained in the final version of the tool; items were rated as important by patients and HCPs. Item scores are summed and converted to a probability score.
CONCLUSION: The final set of items in the Pediatric PainSCAN© has been determined and study results provide further evidence of content validity. Additional research is needed to evaluate the tool's reliability, criterion validity, and select a cutoff score.