MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.67481/ajps.v23i1.20

Медицинская библиотека · African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS · 2026

Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Six Clinical Scoring Systems for Identifying Complicated Appendicitis in School-Aged Children: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Alyhari Qasem, Ghabisha Saif, Al-Wageeh Saleh, Ahmed Faisal, Altam Abdulfattah

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Complicated appendicitis (CA) in children is associated with increased morbidity and prolonged hospitalization. Early identification of patients at higher risk may facilitate timely surgical management and optimize resource utilization.

AIM: to compare the diagnostic performance of six clinical scoring systems for identifying CA in school-aged children.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted among children aged 10-15 years with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis between January 2024 and December 2025. The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Modified Alvarado Scoring System (MASS), Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS), Modified PAS (MPAS), Lintula, and Tzanakis scores were calculated prospectively before surgery. Complicated appendicitis was defined according to the World Society of Emergency Surgery criteria. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, comparison of areas under the curve (AUCs), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Among 360 children included, 132 (36.7%) had complicated appendicitis and 228 (63.3%) had uncomplicated disease. The AIR score demonstrated the highest discriminatory performance, with an AUC of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.82), sensitivity of 76.8%, and specificity of 73.8% at a cut-off value of ≥9. MASS showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67-0.77), followed by Lintula (AUC 0.71), PAS (AUC 0.69), Tzanakis (AUC 0.68), and MPAS (AUC 0.65). DeLong comparison demonstrated significantly higher discrimination of AIR compared with other scoring systems. The AIR score showed the best calibration and highest net clinical benefit on decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

The AIR score demonstrated superior diagnostic performance among six evaluated scoring systems for identifying complicated appendicitis in school-aged children. Its use may improve early risk stratification and clinical decision-making, particularly in settings where advanced imaging resources are limited. External validation in broader paediatric populations is recommended.

Для цитирования: Alyhari Qasem, Ghabisha Saif, Al-Wageeh Saleh, Ahmed Faisal, Altam Abdulfattah. Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Six Clinical Scoring Systems for Identifying Complicated Appendicitis in School-Aged Children: A Multicenter Prospective Study.. African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS. 2026. DOI: 10.67481/ajps.v23i1.20.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.