Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2013
Applicability of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy microperimetry on the fixation patterns of monofixation syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eom Youngsub, Kim Seung-Hyun, Kim Seong-Woo, Cho Yoonae A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the monocular fixation pattern and characteristics in patients with monofixation syndrome using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry (MP).
METHODS: Twenty-four patients older than 5 years who had 8 prism diopters (PD) or less of deviation after surgery were analyzed. The A group included 14 patients with infantile esotropia (ET), and 10 patients with acquired ET were assigned to B group. The monocular fixation pattern and characteristics of all patients were investigated using SLO MP. Central or mild eccentric fixation was defined as eyes with more than 50% of the fixation points located within the 2° diameter circle centred on the fovea.
RESULTS: Mean ages at the time of surgery were 27 (range, 11-48) months in A group and 75 (range, 27-166) months in B group. Mean ages at the time of MP examination were 117 (range, 64-210) months in A group and 106 (range, 64-167) months in B group. Mean distant and near angles of esodeviation were -1.7 PD (-8 to 8) and -2.7 PD (-8 to 6) in A group and 0.6 PD (-2 to 8) and -0.4 PD (-2 to 0) in B group. Central or mild eccentric fixation was present in 8 patients (57%) and moderate or severe eccentric fixation in 6 patients (43%) in A group. In contrast, all patients in B group had central or mild eccentric fixation (p = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative moderate eccentric or severe eccentric fixations were observed in 43% of patients with infantile ET in either eye; however, all patients with acquired ET showed central or mild eccentric fixation in both eyes.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients older than 5 years who had 8 prism diopters (PD) or less of deviation after surgery were analyzed. The A group included 14 patients with infantile esotropia (ET), and 10 patients with acquired ET were assigned to B group. The monocular fixation pattern and characteristics of all patients were investigated using SLO MP. Central or mild eccentric fixation was defined as eyes with more than 50% of the fixation points located within the 2° diameter circle centred on the fovea.
RESULTS: Mean ages at the time of surgery were 27 (range, 11-48) months in A group and 75 (range, 27-166) months in B group. Mean ages at the time of MP examination were 117 (range, 64-210) months in A group and 106 (range, 64-167) months in B group. Mean distant and near angles of esodeviation were -1.7 PD (-8 to 8) and -2.7 PD (-8 to 6) in A group and 0.6 PD (-2 to 8) and -0.4 PD (-2 to 0) in B group. Central or mild eccentric fixation was present in 8 patients (57%) and moderate or severe eccentric fixation in 6 patients (43%) in A group. In contrast, all patients in B group had central or mild eccentric fixation (p = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative moderate eccentric or severe eccentric fixations were observed in 43% of patients with infantile ET in either eye; however, all patients with acquired ET showed central or mild eccentric fixation in both eyes.