American journal of otolaryngology · 2020
Intraoperative tragal and conchal cartilage thickness: Comparative study for cartilage tympanoplasty.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rana Amit Kumar, Sharma Rohit, Sharma Vinit Kumar, Mehrotra Ashish, Upadhyay Deepak
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: In conditions like recurrent perforations, atelectatic tympanic membrane and poor eustachian tube function, temporalis fascia graft fails to give the desired result. In such cases cartilage is used for tympanoplasty. It was demonstrated that if the thickness of cartilage is reduced to around 0.5 mm, the sound conduction is comparable to that of normal tympanic membrane with excellent mechanical stability.
AIM: To intra-operatively measure the mean thickness of tragal and conchal cartilage and compare it for age and sex variations.
MATERIAL & METHODS: A total of 114 tragal and conchal cartilage samples of 86 patients were included in the study. Thickness of cartilages was measured intra-operatively after removing the perichondrium from both sides.
RESULTS: Out of 58 tragal cartilages, 32 were from males and 26 from females. Mean thickness was 1.18 ± 0.11 mm among males and 1.12 ± 0.14 mm among females. Out of 56 conchal cartilage taken, 29 were from males and 27 females. Mean thickness among males were 1.38 ± 0.13 mm and 1.35 ± 0.08 mm in females. In 28 patients both tragal and conchal cartilage was taken. Mean thickness of both tragal (1.22 mm) and conchal cartilage (1.36 mm) increased with increase in age. Among 16 males in whom both cartilages were taken, mean thickness of tragal cartilage was 1.25 ± 0.11 mm and conchal cartilage was 1.41 ± 0.12 mm. Similarly among 12 females where both cartilages were taken, mean thickness of tragal cartilage was 1.20 ± 0.13 mm and conchal cartilage was 1.35 ± 0.07 mm.
CONCLUSION: Sliced cartilage tympanoplasty is a relatively better technique. When using cartilage splitter to get sliced cartilage, ideally thickness of every graft should be known. As it is difficult to measure the exact thickness in every case, so knowing the mean for age and sex for cartilage thickness is important to have an idea of which plates to use for a successful outcome of slicing. We concluded that thickness of tragal cartilage is significantly less than the thickness of conchal cartilage. Also there is significant age related difference between mean thickness of cartilages, both for tragal and conchal cartilage. Surprisingly the difference between thickness in male and female is not statistically different.
AIM: To intra-operatively measure the mean thickness of tragal and conchal cartilage and compare it for age and sex variations.
MATERIAL & METHODS: A total of 114 tragal and conchal cartilage samples of 86 patients were included in the study. Thickness of cartilages was measured intra-operatively after removing the perichondrium from both sides.
RESULTS: Out of 58 tragal cartilages, 32 were from males and 26 from females. Mean thickness was 1.18 ± 0.11 mm among males and 1.12 ± 0.14 mm among females. Out of 56 conchal cartilage taken, 29 were from males and 27 females. Mean thickness among males were 1.38 ± 0.13 mm and 1.35 ± 0.08 mm in females. In 28 patients both tragal and conchal cartilage was taken. Mean thickness of both tragal (1.22 mm) and conchal cartilage (1.36 mm) increased with increase in age. Among 16 males in whom both cartilages were taken, mean thickness of tragal cartilage was 1.25 ± 0.11 mm and conchal cartilage was 1.41 ± 0.12 mm. Similarly among 12 females where both cartilages were taken, mean thickness of tragal cartilage was 1.20 ± 0.13 mm and conchal cartilage was 1.35 ± 0.07 mm.
CONCLUSION: Sliced cartilage tympanoplasty is a relatively better technique. When using cartilage splitter to get sliced cartilage, ideally thickness of every graft should be known. As it is difficult to measure the exact thickness in every case, so knowing the mean for age and sex for cartilage thickness is important to have an idea of which plates to use for a successful outcome of slicing. We concluded that thickness of tragal cartilage is significantly less than the thickness of conchal cartilage. Also there is significant age related difference between mean thickness of cartilages, both for tragal and conchal cartilage. Surprisingly the difference between thickness in male and female is not statistically different.