Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2018
Visual function assessed by visually evoked potentials in optic pathway low-grade gliomas with and without neurofibromatosis type 1.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dotto Patrícia de Freitas, Berezovsky Adriana, Cappellano Andrea Maria, da Silva Nasjla Saba, Sacai Paula Yuri, Silva Frederico Adolfo B, Fernandes Arthur Gustavo, Rocha Daniel Martins, Salomão Solange Rios
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the contribution of full-field transient pattern-reversal visually evoked potentials (PRVEP) on cross-sectional evaluations of visual function in patients with and without neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) affected by optic pathway low-grade gliomas (OPLGG).
METHODS: Participants were children and adolescents referred for visual function evaluation and receiving treatment for OPLGG, linked (NF1-OPLGG) or not to NF1 (Non-NF1-OPLGG). An age-adjusted control group was included for comparison. Monocular full-field PRVEPs were recorded from each eye in accordance with ISCEV standards. Parameters of peak-to-peak P100 amplitude (µV) and P100 peak time (ms) were measured. Cutoff normative values obtained from controls for 15' and 60' check sizes were ≥ 9.0 µV for N75-P100 amplitude and ≤ 103.0 ms for P100 peak time. The association of age, gender, tumor resection and NF1 with P100 amplitude reduction and P100 peak time delay was explored by Firth logistic regression modeling.
RESULTS: Participants were 30 patients (15 males, 60% Non-NF1) with ages from 3.6 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 9.2 ± 3.8 years; median = 8.4 years) and 19 controls (12 males) with ages from 3.7 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 10.4 ± 4.9 years; median = 9.5 years). Overall, 68% of tested eyes presented reduced P100 amplitudes for both check sizes (46% in the NF-1 and 83% in the Non-NF1) and delayed P100 for both check sizes (38% in NF1 and 89% in Non-NF1). Absence of NF1 adjusted for age, gender and tumor resection was significantly associated with marginally reduced P100 amplitude for 15' checks [odds ratio (OR): 6.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-40.94; p = 0.055].
CONCLUSIONS: Full-field PRVEP on cross-sectional evaluations contributed to detect visual dysfunction in two-thirds of patients with OPLGG by highlighting subclinical evidence of visual loss. Abnormalities were more frequent and more severe in OPLGG not linked to NF1 than in NF1-OPLGG; however, there was a difference in surgical management between these groups. PRVEP parameters may provide reliable evidence of visual pathway involvement in OPLGG, helping to hasten treatment before optic atrophy is detected.
METHODS: Participants were children and adolescents referred for visual function evaluation and receiving treatment for OPLGG, linked (NF1-OPLGG) or not to NF1 (Non-NF1-OPLGG). An age-adjusted control group was included for comparison. Monocular full-field PRVEPs were recorded from each eye in accordance with ISCEV standards. Parameters of peak-to-peak P100 amplitude (µV) and P100 peak time (ms) were measured. Cutoff normative values obtained from controls for 15' and 60' check sizes were ≥ 9.0 µV for N75-P100 amplitude and ≤ 103.0 ms for P100 peak time. The association of age, gender, tumor resection and NF1 with P100 amplitude reduction and P100 peak time delay was explored by Firth logistic regression modeling.
RESULTS: Participants were 30 patients (15 males, 60% Non-NF1) with ages from 3.6 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 9.2 ± 3.8 years; median = 8.4 years) and 19 controls (12 males) with ages from 3.7 to 19.9 years (mean ± SD = 10.4 ± 4.9 years; median = 9.5 years). Overall, 68% of tested eyes presented reduced P100 amplitudes for both check sizes (46% in the NF-1 and 83% in the Non-NF1) and delayed P100 for both check sizes (38% in NF1 and 89% in Non-NF1). Absence of NF1 adjusted for age, gender and tumor resection was significantly associated with marginally reduced P100 amplitude for 15' checks [odds ratio (OR): 6.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-40.94; p = 0.055].
CONCLUSIONS: Full-field PRVEP on cross-sectional evaluations contributed to detect visual dysfunction in two-thirds of patients with OPLGG by highlighting subclinical evidence of visual loss. Abnormalities were more frequent and more severe in OPLGG not linked to NF1 than in NF1-OPLGG; however, there was a difference in surgical management between these groups. PRVEP parameters may provide reliable evidence of visual pathway involvement in OPLGG, helping to hasten treatment before optic atrophy is detected.