Auris, nasus, larynx · 2010
Role of subjective visual vertical test during eccentric rotation in the recovery phase of vestibular neuritis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Byun Jae Yong, Hong Seok Min, Yeo Seung Geun, Kim Sang Hoon, Kim Sung Wan, Park Moon Suh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: By assessing unilateral utricular function at the acute and subacute stages, we sought to determine the ability of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) during eccentric rotation (dynamic SVV) in detecting latent abnormality of otolith dysfunction in unilateral vestibular neuritis. In addition, we compared the validity of the dynamic SVV with static SVV during the compensated recovery phase.
METHODS: The static SVV and dynamic SVV of 19 patients diagnosed with acute unilateral vestibular neuritis and 31 patients diagnosed with the subacute stage of vestibular neuritis were determined in this study. First, the static SVV was measured in a dark booth without rotation. The dynamic SVV was measured during rotation with an eccentric displacement of the head to 3.5cm from the vertical rotation axis during a constant velocity of 300 degrees /s.
RESULTS: In the acute stage of vestibular neuritis, the static SVV showed an increase in deviation to the side of the lesion compared to findings in normal subjects. In the subacute stage, it did not differ significantly from that of the normal subjects. The dynamic SVV, however, had a statistically significant increase in deviation to the side of the lesion compared to normal subjects in both the acute and subacute stages.
CONCLUSION: The dynamic SVV would be an effective method in detecting latent abnormality of otolith dysfunction in unilateral vestibular neuritis, compared to static SVV, especially compensated unilateral vestibular neuritis.
METHODS: The static SVV and dynamic SVV of 19 patients diagnosed with acute unilateral vestibular neuritis and 31 patients diagnosed with the subacute stage of vestibular neuritis were determined in this study. First, the static SVV was measured in a dark booth without rotation. The dynamic SVV was measured during rotation with an eccentric displacement of the head to 3.5cm from the vertical rotation axis during a constant velocity of 300 degrees /s.
RESULTS: In the acute stage of vestibular neuritis, the static SVV showed an increase in deviation to the side of the lesion compared to findings in normal subjects. In the subacute stage, it did not differ significantly from that of the normal subjects. The dynamic SVV, however, had a statistically significant increase in deviation to the side of the lesion compared to normal subjects in both the acute and subacute stages.
CONCLUSION: The dynamic SVV would be an effective method in detecting latent abnormality of otolith dysfunction in unilateral vestibular neuritis, compared to static SVV, especially compensated unilateral vestibular neuritis.