DOI 10.1016/j.mycmed.2022.101276
Antifungal combination therapy for invasive fungal infections in a paediatric oncology and haematology department: A retrospective analysis of practice.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children with leukaemia. International guidelines recommend a monotherapy for most IFI. The use of antifungal combination therapy (ACT) has been reported, but clinical data supporting these combinations are scarce, particularly in paediatrics.
OBJECTIVE
To describe, among patients treated in our department, the situations in which an ACT was used.
RESULTS
Between January 2017 and December 2020, 239 patients (406 hospital stays) benefited from systemic antifungals. Among them, ACT was prescribed for 14 (5.9%) patients (13 leukaemia, 1 aplastic anaemia) corresponding to 16 (3.9%) hospital stays. IFI cases treated with ACT were mainly proven (n=9) or probable (n=4). Seven cases required admission to the intensive care unit. The most commonly used antifungal agents were liposomal amphotericin B (n=13), caspofungin (n=12) and voriconazole (n=9). In 13 cases, monotherapy was prescribed as first-line therapy and changed to an ACT for an uncontrolled infection. But in 3 cases, the ACT was started immediately. The response at 12 weeks after diagnosis of proven/probable IFI was successful in 12 cases (92.3%). The only IFI-related death was attributed to disseminated mucormycosis. ACT were generally well tolerated. In 4 cases, adverse events led to the discontinuation of the offending antifungal agent.
CONCLUSION
This retrospective analysis of practices shows that the use of ACT in our paediatric haemato-oncology department is rare, and concerns the most severe cases and/or those not responding to the first line treatment. In most cases, ACT was efficient and well tolerated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.