Systematic review of neuroparacoccidioidomycosis: The contribution of neuroimaging.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Advanced neuroimaging demonstrated that neurological involvement occurs in up to 30% of paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) cases. Current knowledge of neuroparacoccidioidomycosis (NPCM) is based on a 2009 systematic review. However, in the last decade, several new cases have been published, with modern neuroimaging techniques.
OBJECTIVES
We believe a new systematic review is needed to summarise these advances.
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS for studies from January 2010 to May 2022. Case series and case reports of NPCM were included. We performed a metaproportion to estimate a summary proportion with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Thirty-four studies including 104 patients were evaluated. We combined our data with the results from the previous review that included 257 cases, totalling 361 patients. We found no new important demographic, clinical or laboratory characteristics. On magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we found that 72% (95%CI: 38-91) had hyperintensity on T1-weighted image; 84% (95%CI: 71%-92%) had hypointensity on T2-weighted image; 80% (95%CI: 66-89) had contrast enhancement with the classical ring-enhancing pattern. All 8 patients undergoing spectroscopy presented lipid peaks. We found a 16% mortality, lower than in the previous review (44%).
CONCLUSION
NPCM presents a characteristic pattern on MRI that may help to differentiate it from other causes of single or multiple brain lesions. Albeit there is a frequent pattern, it is not specific, as other granulomatous diseases may show similar findings. Advances in neuroimaging with early diagnosis and appropriate management of the disease may have contributed to reducing its mortality.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.