MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/000331970505600614

Медицинская библиотека · Angiology · 2005

Intracoronary macrothrombus formation during percutaneous coronary intervention despite optimal activated clotting time using bivalirudin--a case report.

Tadros George M, Broder Kevin, Bachour Fouad

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The occurrence of intracoronary thrombus during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a well-known complication. It has been estimated that it complicates approximately 6% of all coronary procedures. Patients at highest risk for this complication include those with acute ischemic syndromes or with angiographically apparent thrombus. Since the development of PCI, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) has remained the primary antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of periprocedural ischemic complications. The availability of a rapid "point of care'' test for dose individualization (the activated clotting time [ACT]) has facilitated this process. Other forms of antithrombotic therapies such as direct thrombin inhibitors or low-molecular-weight heparin have been proposed as more effective anticoagulants during PCI. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor proven to decrease post-PCI ischemic complication rate compared with UFH and have a lower vascular complication rate compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. We herein report a case of acute macrothrombus formation during PCI despite adequate ACT achieved with bivalirudin.

Для цитирования: Tadros George M, Broder Kevin, Bachour Fouad. Intracoronary macrothrombus formation during percutaneous coronary intervention despite optimal activated clotting time using bivalirudin--a case report.. Angiology. 2005. DOI: 10.1177/000331970505600614.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.