MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.63-65

Медицинская библиотека · Medicinski arhiv · 2012

Treatment of eyelid injuries during period 2008-2010 at eye clinic of clinical center University of Prishtina.

Shoshi Mire, Shoshi Avdyl, Xhafa Agim, Kastrati Fetije, Shoshi Fitore, Shoshi Fjolla

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In the Eye Clinic during 2008-2010 we have treated 446 patients, where 252 were hospitalized patients while 184 weren't. Treated patients were 1-85 years old.

AIM OF THIS STUDY: AIM OF THIS STUDY is to present our experience in treatment of patients with eye lids injuries and their reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

In patients that were treated in the Eye Clinic, we have applied surgical methods, anti-tetanic protection and local and general medical therapy. 252 hospitalized patients also had other injuries of eye such as: rupture of bulbus, traumatic cataract, prolapsus iris, hyphaema in CA, prolapsus CV, VLC perforanc cornea et corpus alieni in CA, hyphaema totalis, VLC sclera, corpus alieni intrabulbares.

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSION

Patients that weren't hospitalized were 5-10 years old, 25-35 years old and 20-25 years old. Hospitalized patients were 5-10 years old, 20-25 years old and 30-35 years old. By this we can conclude that there wasn't any significant difference based on the patients' age. In the hospitalized cases with eye-lid injuries, most injuries of the eye were: VLC perforanc cornea cum prolapsus iridea, Corpus alieni in CA et hyphaema.

Для цитирования: Shoshi Mire, Shoshi Avdyl, Xhafa Agim, Kastrati Fetije, Shoshi Fitore, Shoshi Fjolla. Treatment of eyelid injuries during period 2008-2010 at eye clinic of clinical center University of Prishtina.. Medicinski arhiv. 2012. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2012.66.63-65.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.