AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2026
Visualization of Nerve Pathology and Correlation with Clinical Severity in Bell Palsy Using 3D Double-Echo Steady-State with Water Excitation Sequence.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujii Hiroyuki, Kikuchi Tomohiro, Fujii Nana, Chiba Emiko, Masuoka Sota, Nakamata Akihiro, Hamamoto Kohei, Matsuki Mitsuru, Mori Harushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bell palsy (BP) is the most common cause of facial nerve (FN) palsy. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic ability of the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation (3D-DESS-WE) sequence to visualize pathologic changes in the FN of patients with BP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with BP who underwent 3T MRI including 3D-DESS-WE within 30 days of onset and 60 sex- and age (SD, 2) matched controls. Qualitative evaluation of FN signal intensity (SIFN) and thickness (THFN) was performed using a 3-point scale. Quantitative metrics included SIFN and THFN measurements and affected-to-unaffected signal intensity and thickness ratios (SRA/U and TRA/U) in the BP group, and right-to-left ratios in controls. Interobserver agreement, group comparisons, correlations with clinical severity (Yanagihara score), and diagnostic performance were assessed. In a subset of 17 matched pairs, the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced (CE) T1WI was assessed, and its agreement with 3D-DESS-WE-based qualitative assessment was evaluated.
RESULTS: Qualitative scores for SIFN and THFN were significantly higher in the BP group than in controls (P < .001), with high interobserver agreement (κ = 0.810, 0.788, respectively). When dichotomized (score 0 versus 1-2), qualitative assessments showed good diagnostic performance with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.82 for SIFN, and 0.90 and 0.80 for THFN, respectively. Neither qualitative score correlated significantly with clinical severity. Agreement between 3D-DESS-WE-based and CE T1WI-based qualitative assessments was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.766-0.882). In quantitative analysis, both SIFN and THFN were significantly higher on the affected side in the BP group (P < .001), whereas no significant lateral differences were observed in controls. Although SIFN, THFN, and SRA/U did not correlate significantly with clinical severity, TRA/U was significantly inversely correlated with the Yanagihara score (r = -0.413, P = .02), which corresponds to a positive correlation with clinical severity. The Yanagihara score was the only independent predictor of TRA/U in multiple regression analysis (β = -0.425, P = .04). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed high diagnostic performance: area under the curve = 0.908 for SRA/U and 0.927 for TRA/U.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-DESS-WE may be a valuable tool for the routine clinical assessment of BP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with BP who underwent 3T MRI including 3D-DESS-WE within 30 days of onset and 60 sex- and age (SD, 2) matched controls. Qualitative evaluation of FN signal intensity (SIFN) and thickness (THFN) was performed using a 3-point scale. Quantitative metrics included SIFN and THFN measurements and affected-to-unaffected signal intensity and thickness ratios (SRA/U and TRA/U) in the BP group, and right-to-left ratios in controls. Interobserver agreement, group comparisons, correlations with clinical severity (Yanagihara score), and diagnostic performance were assessed. In a subset of 17 matched pairs, the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced (CE) T1WI was assessed, and its agreement with 3D-DESS-WE-based qualitative assessment was evaluated.
RESULTS: Qualitative scores for SIFN and THFN were significantly higher in the BP group than in controls (P < .001), with high interobserver agreement (κ = 0.810, 0.788, respectively). When dichotomized (score 0 versus 1-2), qualitative assessments showed good diagnostic performance with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.82 for SIFN, and 0.90 and 0.80 for THFN, respectively. Neither qualitative score correlated significantly with clinical severity. Agreement between 3D-DESS-WE-based and CE T1WI-based qualitative assessments was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.766-0.882). In quantitative analysis, both SIFN and THFN were significantly higher on the affected side in the BP group (P < .001), whereas no significant lateral differences were observed in controls. Although SIFN, THFN, and SRA/U did not correlate significantly with clinical severity, TRA/U was significantly inversely correlated with the Yanagihara score (r = -0.413, P = .02), which corresponds to a positive correlation with clinical severity. The Yanagihara score was the only independent predictor of TRA/U in multiple regression analysis (β = -0.425, P = .04). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed high diagnostic performance: area under the curve = 0.908 for SRA/U and 0.927 for TRA/U.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-DESS-WE may be a valuable tool for the routine clinical assessment of BP.