MedElevator
Войти в исследования Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · 2008
[Prograde conduction of the pathway in pre-excitation syndrome may shorten PJ interval].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Ren-Guang, Xu Zhao-Long, Zhang Ying-Jie, Sun Kai, Wang Gao-Pin, Chen Qi, Guo Fei, Lu Zhao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the PJ interval in the patients with pre-excitation syndrome can be shortened by pathway conduction, and to explore the clinical implications of the prolonged PJ interval.
METHODS: 143 patients with single pathway, who experienced successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation, were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 132) with normal atrioventricular and ventricular conduction (sub-divided into 10 subsets further according to the location of the pathway) and Group B (n = 11) with first degree atrioventricular block or with bundle branch block. The ECG images with and without pathway conduction were analyzed.
RESULTS: (1) The PJ interval in the patients with right posterior pathway or with right septal pathway was shortened significantly after the RF [(226 +/- 18) ms vs (236 +/- 19) ms and (221 +/- 18) ms vs (238 +/- 31) ms respectively, both P < 0.05 ]; (2) The PJ interval in Group B was shortened to different extents. The PJ interval values in 4 patients with first degree atrioventricular block were shortened, but still beyond normal extent. The PJ interval values in 4 patients with bundle branch block were shortened to normal extent.
CONCLUSION: If the pre-excitation syndrome patients have normal atrioventricular conduction the PJ interval is normal or the PJ interval may be shortened. If the patients have prolonged atrioventricular conduction, the PJ interval may be shortened by the pathway prograde conduction. PJ interval prolongation indicates atrioventricular conduction delay or ventricular conduction block, but bundle branch block cannot be excluded when the PJ interval is normal.
METHODS: 143 patients with single pathway, who experienced successful radiofrequency (RF) ablation, were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 132) with normal atrioventricular and ventricular conduction (sub-divided into 10 subsets further according to the location of the pathway) and Group B (n = 11) with first degree atrioventricular block or with bundle branch block. The ECG images with and without pathway conduction were analyzed.
RESULTS: (1) The PJ interval in the patients with right posterior pathway or with right septal pathway was shortened significantly after the RF [(226 +/- 18) ms vs (236 +/- 19) ms and (221 +/- 18) ms vs (238 +/- 31) ms respectively, both P < 0.05 ]; (2) The PJ interval in Group B was shortened to different extents. The PJ interval values in 4 patients with first degree atrioventricular block were shortened, but still beyond normal extent. The PJ interval values in 4 patients with bundle branch block were shortened to normal extent.
CONCLUSION: If the pre-excitation syndrome patients have normal atrioventricular conduction the PJ interval is normal or the PJ interval may be shortened. If the patients have prolonged atrioventricular conduction, the PJ interval may be shortened by the pathway prograde conduction. PJ interval prolongation indicates atrioventricular conduction delay or ventricular conduction block, but bundle branch block cannot be excluded when the PJ interval is normal.