Acta oto-laryngologica · 2017
Kinetic oscillatory stimulation of nasal mucosa in non-allergic rhinitis: comparison of patient self-administration and caregiver administration regarding pain and treatment effect. A randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Juto Alexander, Juto Anna Josefine, von Hofsten Per, Jörgensen Finn
Аннотация
CONCLUSION: Patient self-administration of the Kinetic Oscillatory Stimulation (KOS)-catheter was a fully acceptable alternative to insertion of the catheter by physician with helmet fixation, in patients with non-allergic rhinitis (NAR). The approaches were equivalent regarding pain. The treatment effect in the patient self-administration group was not inferior.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether self-administration of a KOS-catheter was different compared to insertion by a physician, assessed with patient reported pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Also, to evaluate the difference in nasal stuffiness with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF).
METHODS: Patients with NAR were randomized to group 1, patient insertion of catheter and manual fixation, and group 2, catheter insertion by physician and fixation with a helmet. Patients were treated once, 10 min in each nasal cavity, and followed up 14 days later.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (group 1, n = 14; group 2, n = 15). There was no statistical significant difference in patient reported pain between groups. There was a decrease in nasal stuffiness after treatment in the total study population (n = 26, p = 0.001). In group 1 nasal stuffiness was decreased and in group 2 there was no change (group 1, p = 0.004; group 2, p = 0.071). No statistical significant change in PNIF was observed.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether self-administration of a KOS-catheter was different compared to insertion by a physician, assessed with patient reported pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Also, to evaluate the difference in nasal stuffiness with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF).
METHODS: Patients with NAR were randomized to group 1, patient insertion of catheter and manual fixation, and group 2, catheter insertion by physician and fixation with a helmet. Patients were treated once, 10 min in each nasal cavity, and followed up 14 days later.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included (group 1, n = 14; group 2, n = 15). There was no statistical significant difference in patient reported pain between groups. There was a decrease in nasal stuffiness after treatment in the total study population (n = 26, p = 0.001). In group 1 nasal stuffiness was decreased and in group 2 there was no change (group 1, p = 0.004; group 2, p = 0.071). No statistical significant change in PNIF was observed.