DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.023
Improving the prediction of streptococcal pharyngitis; time to move past exudate alone.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Palatal petechiae are predictive of Group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis. We sought to (a) quantify the value of considering petechiae in addition to exudate, and (b) assess provider incorporation of petechiae's predictive nature for GAS into clinical decision making.
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients 3-21 years with sore throat and GAS testing performed in a pediatric emergency department (ED) in 2016. Patients were excluded if immunosuppressed, nonverbal, medically complex, had chronic tonsillitis, or received antibiotics in the preceding week. As a proxy of provider incorporation of petechiae into clinical decision making we assessed how often petechiae were documented, compared with exudate. We performed univariate analysis using χ2 analysis for categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data.
RESULTS
1574 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age 8 years [IQR 5, 13]; 54% female. 372 patients (24%) were GAS positive. Both palatal petechiae and tonsillar exudates were predictive of GAS [OR 8.5 (95% CI 5.2-13.9), and 1.9 (95% CI 1.4-2.6) respectively]. Examining petechiae or exudate vs. exudate alone increases OR from 1.9 to 2.9 (95% CI 2.2-3.8). Sensitivity improves (23% to 34%) with minimal change to specificity (87% to 85%). Among those with a normal or erythematous throat exam, petechiae were mentioned as a pertinent negative in 28%; absence of tonsillar exudate was mentioned in 78% (p = .02).
CONCLUSIONS
Palatal petechiae are highly associated with GAS, yet rarely addressed in documentation. Incorporating palatal petechiae into common scoring systems could improve prediction and disseminate this knowledge into practice.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.