Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2022
The Dyskinesia Impairment Scale, Second Edition: Development, construct validity, and reliability.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vanmechelen Inti, Danielsson Annika, Lidbeck Cecilia, Tedroff Kristina, Monbaliu Elegast, Krumlinde-Sundholm Lena
Аннотация
AIM: To create a shortened, more user-friendly Second Edition of the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS-II) to assess dystonia and choreoathetosis, and evaluate its construct validity and reliability.
METHOD: Scale development included an online expert meeting (n = 21) and iterative discussions within the research group (n = 6). A Rasch measurement model analysis on DIS scores from individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy or inherited/idiopathic dystonia (n = 123, 74 males, mean age 14 years, SD 5 years) was performed to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the DIS-II.
RESULTS: The DIS-II evaluates dystonia and choreoathetosis in action and rest in 11 body regions, with action items scored from 0 to 3 and rest items 0 to 2. The number of videos to record are reduced from 26 to 14 and the items to score are reduced from 144 to 88. Rating scale functioning, goodness-of-fit evaluation, principal component analysis, and targeting met the predefined quality criteria of the study and construct validity was therefore considered good. Furthermore, person reliability indicated that the DIS-II can separate individuals into eight distinct ability levels.
INTERPRETATION: The DIS-II provides valid and reliable measures for dystonia and choreoathetosis, and reduces the administration and scoring time compared with the DIS. The DIS-II logit scores (interval level data) enhance comparison over time and between individuals in clinical practice and research.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Compared with the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS), the shortened edition (DIS-II) requires half of the number of videos to be scored. The DIS-II has a simplified rating scale, requiring scoring of 88 instead of 144 items. The DIS-II has shown excellent reliability and good construct validity. The interval properties of the DIS-II are superior to the ordinal level outcome measures of the DIS.
METHOD: Scale development included an online expert meeting (n = 21) and iterative discussions within the research group (n = 6). A Rasch measurement model analysis on DIS scores from individuals with dyskinetic cerebral palsy or inherited/idiopathic dystonia (n = 123, 74 males, mean age 14 years, SD 5 years) was performed to evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the DIS-II.
RESULTS: The DIS-II evaluates dystonia and choreoathetosis in action and rest in 11 body regions, with action items scored from 0 to 3 and rest items 0 to 2. The number of videos to record are reduced from 26 to 14 and the items to score are reduced from 144 to 88. Rating scale functioning, goodness-of-fit evaluation, principal component analysis, and targeting met the predefined quality criteria of the study and construct validity was therefore considered good. Furthermore, person reliability indicated that the DIS-II can separate individuals into eight distinct ability levels.
INTERPRETATION: The DIS-II provides valid and reliable measures for dystonia and choreoathetosis, and reduces the administration and scoring time compared with the DIS. The DIS-II logit scores (interval level data) enhance comparison over time and between individuals in clinical practice and research.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Compared with the Dyskinesia Impairment Scale (DIS), the shortened edition (DIS-II) requires half of the number of videos to be scored. The DIS-II has a simplified rating scale, requiring scoring of 88 instead of 144 items. The DIS-II has shown excellent reliability and good construct validity. The interval properties of the DIS-II are superior to the ordinal level outcome measures of the DIS.