MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5935/1808-8694.20130111

Медицинская библиотека · Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2013

Mouth breathing in children with learning disorders.

Fensterseifer Giovana Serrão, Carpes Oswaldo, Weckx Luc Louis Maurice, Martha Viviane Feller

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Given the importance of studying the causes of learning disorders, we designed this case-control study to assess the nasal cavity volume, pharyngeal and palatine tonsils in children with and without learning disabilities.

METHOD: A total of forty-eight children were enrolled in the study: twenty-four coming from the Center for Evaluation and Early Stimulation (CADEP), in which the criterion is the school failure of at least two consecutive years; and twenty-four students with normal learning - which made up the control group. The children were submitted to ENT examination (history, physical examination) and specific tests (acoustic rhinometry, cavum radiography).

RESULTS

The results showed that students with learning disabilities have a higher prevalence of pharyngeal tonsil hypertrophy: p < 0.001, and palatine tonsil hypertrophy: p < 0.001. The average volume of the nasal cavities showed no statistically significant association with learning difficulties (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Based on this study, we concluded that children with adenotonsillar hypertrophy have more learning difficulties when compared to children without such hypertrophy.

Для цитирования: Fensterseifer Giovana Serrão, Carpes Oswaldo, Weckx Luc Louis Maurice, Martha Viviane Feller. Mouth breathing in children with learning disorders.. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2013. DOI: 10.5935/1808-8694.20130111.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.