The American journal of psychiatry · 1994
Field trial for autistic disorder in DSM-IV.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Volkmar F R, Klin A, Siegel B, Szatmari P, Lord C, Campbell M, Freeman B J, Cicchetti D V, Rutter M, Kline W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This project focused on the development of the definition of autism for DSM-IV.
METHOD: Multiple sites were involved in obtaining information regarding 977 patients with the following clinician-assigned diagnoses: autism (N = 454), other pervasive developmental disorders (N = 240), and other disorders (N = 283). A standard coding system was used, and the raters (N = 125) had a range of experience in the diagnosis of autism. Patterns of agreement among existing diagnostic systems were examined, as was the rationale for inclusion of other disorders within the class of pervasive developmental disorders.
RESULTS: The DSM-III-R definition of autism was found to be overly broad. The proposed ICD-10 definition most closely approximated the clinicians' diagnoses. Inclusion of other disorders within pervasive developmental disorders appeared justified. Partly on the basis of these data, modifications in the ICD-10 definition were made; this and the DSM-IV definition are conceptually identical.
CONCLUSIONS: The resulting convergence of the DSM-IV and ICD-10 systems should facilitate both research and clinical service.
METHOD: Multiple sites were involved in obtaining information regarding 977 patients with the following clinician-assigned diagnoses: autism (N = 454), other pervasive developmental disorders (N = 240), and other disorders (N = 283). A standard coding system was used, and the raters (N = 125) had a range of experience in the diagnosis of autism. Patterns of agreement among existing diagnostic systems were examined, as was the rationale for inclusion of other disorders within the class of pervasive developmental disorders.
RESULTS: The DSM-III-R definition of autism was found to be overly broad. The proposed ICD-10 definition most closely approximated the clinicians' diagnoses. Inclusion of other disorders within pervasive developmental disorders appeared justified. Partly on the basis of these data, modifications in the ICD-10 definition were made; this and the DSM-IV definition are conceptually identical.
CONCLUSIONS: The resulting convergence of the DSM-IV and ICD-10 systems should facilitate both research and clinical service.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age of OnsetAutistic DisorderChildChild Development Disorders, PervasiveDiagnosis, DifferentialEvaluation Studies as TopicFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMutismPredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTerminology as Topic