DOI 10.1097/iop.0000000000003063
Horizontal Palpebral Fissure Best Predicts Subjective Facial Asymmetry in Unilateral Anophthalmia/Microphthalmia.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Congenital anophthalmia/microphthalmia are developmental eye disorders with variable severity. The absence of a normal-sized eye can cause facial asymmetry. Outcome is often reported as relative horizontal palpebral fissure (rHPF) and/or orbital dimensions. Yet, the predictive value of these measurements is unknown. This study aims to test the relation between facial and ultrasound measurements and subjective outcomes.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, 3D facial scans of 31 patients with unilateral an/microphthalmia were analyzed. The scans were obtained using the Vectra scanner, and measurements were taken using GOM Inspect software. Various facial landmarks were identified, including horizontal palpebral fissure (HPF), lower lid, upper eyelid, lid crease, and inferior eyebrow margin. Orbital width, orbital height, and axial eye length were measured using ultrasonography. Ratios between the affected and unaffected sides were calculated from these measurements. Faces were also subjectively rated for the degree of asymmetry on a scale of 1 to 5.
RESULTS
Average subjective judgment showed a significant association with, respectively, rHPF ( p < 0.001), caudal placement of the eye ( p < 0.001), orbital width ( p = 0.001), pretarsal show asymmetry ( p = 0.003), and axial length ( p = 0.003). After a forward selection procedure, only rHPF predicted the subjective outcome. rHPF was strongly correlated with the other significant factors.
CONCLUSION
The results indicate that the rHPF is best associated with subjective outcome. The forward selection procedure showed that adding ultrasound or other facial measurements did not result in a better association.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.