Histopathology · 2012
The value of immunohistochemistry for CD14, CD123, CD33, myeloperoxidase and CD68R in the diagnosis of acute and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemias.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rollins-Raval Marian A, Roth Christine G
Аннотация
AIMS: In the absence of adequate aspirate films and touch imprints, distinction of chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) from acute myeloid leukaemia with monocytic differentiation (Mo-AML) may be difficult solely on the basis of bone marrow biopsy morphological features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of a novel immunohistochemical panel for the diagnosis of acute and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemias in bone marrow biopsies.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemical labelling for CD14, CD123, CD33, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and CD68R was assessed in 49 myeloid neoplasms with monocytic differentiation (24 CMMLs and 25 Mo-AMLs) and compared with that of 15 non-monocytic acute myeloid leukaemias (NM-AMLs) and 17 non-neoplastic controls. More than 20% CD14 immunohistochemistry (IHC)+ cells were seen only in Mo-AMLs and CMMLs, although Mo-AMLs showed wide variability and overlapped with other categories. More than 20% CD68R IHC+ cells had the highest sensitivity and specificity for Mo-AML. Discrepant MPO-/CD33+ expression was specific for Mo-AML but insensitive. A subset of blasts in Mo-AMLs and NM-AMLs were weakly CD123+.
CONCLUSIONS: A significantly increased number of CD14+ cells raises the possibility of a myelomonocytic neoplasm but does not distinguish between CMML and Mo-AML. Significantly increased numbers of CD68R IHC+ cells and a discrepant MPO-/CD33+ staining pattern are specific for Mo-AML but are best utilized in a comprehensive panel.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Immunohistochemical labelling for CD14, CD123, CD33, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and CD68R was assessed in 49 myeloid neoplasms with monocytic differentiation (24 CMMLs and 25 Mo-AMLs) and compared with that of 15 non-monocytic acute myeloid leukaemias (NM-AMLs) and 17 non-neoplastic controls. More than 20% CD14 immunohistochemistry (IHC)+ cells were seen only in Mo-AMLs and CMMLs, although Mo-AMLs showed wide variability and overlapped with other categories. More than 20% CD68R IHC+ cells had the highest sensitivity and specificity for Mo-AML. Discrepant MPO-/CD33+ expression was specific for Mo-AML but insensitive. A subset of blasts in Mo-AMLs and NM-AMLs were weakly CD123+.
CONCLUSIONS: A significantly increased number of CD14+ cells raises the possibility of a myelomonocytic neoplasm but does not distinguish between CMML and Mo-AML. Significantly increased numbers of CD68R IHC+ cells and a discrepant MPO-/CD33+ staining pattern are specific for Mo-AML but are best utilized in a comprehensive panel.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticBiomarkers, TumorChildChild, PreschoolHumansImmunohistochemistryInfantInterleukin-3 Receptor alpha SubunitLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, AcuteLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMiddle AgedPeroxidaseRetrospective StudiesSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 3Young Adult