MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/17518423.2017.1305004

Медицинская библиотека · Developmental neurorehabilitation · 2017

Emotion recognition training in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of challenges related to generalizability.

Berggren Steve, Fletcher-Watson Sue, Milenkovic Nina, Marschik Peter B, Bölte Sven, Jonsson Ulf

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the generalizability of findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating emotion recognition (ER) training for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

METHODS

We present a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the determinants of external validity in RCTs on ER training. Generalizability of the findings across situations, populations, settings, treatment delivery, and intervention formats was considered.

RESULTS

We identified 13 eligible studies. Participants were predominantly boys with ASD in the normative IQ range (IQ > 70), with an age span from 4 to 18 years across studies. Interventions and outcome measures were highly variable. Several studies indicated that training may improve ER, but it is still largely unknown to what extent training effects are translated to daily social life.

CONCLUSION

The generalizability of findings from currently available RCTs remains unclear. This underscores the importance of involving children with ASD and their caregivers in informed treatment decisions.

Для цитирования: Berggren Steve, Fletcher-Watson Sue, Milenkovic Nina, Marschik Peter B, Bölte Sven, Jonsson Ulf. Emotion recognition training in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of challenges related to generalizability.. Developmental neurorehabilitation. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/17518423.2017.1305004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.