European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
Efficacy of biologic agents in patients with comorbid asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kyriakopoulos Christos, Ntritsos Georgios, Gogali Athena, Papanikolaou Anastasia, Angelopoulos Vasileios, Oikonomou Emmanouil D, Kostikas Konstantinos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Multiple biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have been evaluated for the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) separately.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus (up to 31 October 2025) was conducted. Random-effects meta-analysis assessed efficacy and safety outcomes.
RESULTS: 16 studies involving 3598 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, biologics reduced asthma exacerbations by 73% (rate ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.21-0.34), increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 0.21 L (95% CI 0.11-0.30), improved asthma control questionnaire score by -0.70 points (95% CI -0.83--0.56) and asthma quality of life questionnaire score by 0.71 points (95% CI 0.49-0.93). Regarding sino-nasal outcomes, the sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) score was reduced by 15.15 points (95% CI -19.64--10.66), the nasal polyp score by 1.39 points (95% CI -1.88--0.89), the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score by 6.64 points (95% CI -8.88--4.40) and the nasal congestion/obstruction score by 0.84 points (95% CI -1.13--0.54). Heterogeneity across biologic classes varied by outcome, ranging from low to substantial. Overall, biologics exhibited a favourable safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Biologics significantly reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function, asthma control and quality of life, and alleviated sino-nasal outcomes in patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP, with an acceptable safety profile.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus (up to 31 October 2025) was conducted. Random-effects meta-analysis assessed efficacy and safety outcomes.
RESULTS: 16 studies involving 3598 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, biologics reduced asthma exacerbations by 73% (rate ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.21-0.34), increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 0.21 L (95% CI 0.11-0.30), improved asthma control questionnaire score by -0.70 points (95% CI -0.83--0.56) and asthma quality of life questionnaire score by 0.71 points (95% CI 0.49-0.93). Regarding sino-nasal outcomes, the sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) score was reduced by 15.15 points (95% CI -19.64--10.66), the nasal polyp score by 1.39 points (95% CI -1.88--0.89), the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score by 6.64 points (95% CI -8.88--4.40) and the nasal congestion/obstruction score by 0.84 points (95% CI -1.13--0.54). Heterogeneity across biologic classes varied by outcome, ranging from low to substantial. Overall, biologics exhibited a favourable safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS: Biologics significantly reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function, asthma control and quality of life, and alleviated sino-nasal outcomes in patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP, with an acceptable safety profile.