DOI 10.1183/16000617.0186-2025
Efficacy of biologic agents in patients with comorbid asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Multiple biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have been evaluated for the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) separately.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus (up to 31 October 2025) was conducted. Random-effects meta-analysis assessed efficacy and safety outcomes.
RESULTS
16 studies involving 3598 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, biologics reduced asthma exacerbations by 73% (rate ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.21-0.34), increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 0.21 L (95% CI 0.11-0.30), improved asthma control questionnaire score by -0.70 points (95% CI -0.83--0.56) and asthma quality of life questionnaire score by 0.71 points (95% CI 0.49-0.93). Regarding sino-nasal outcomes, the sino-nasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) score was reduced by 15.15 points (95% CI -19.64--10.66), the nasal polyp score by 1.39 points (95% CI -1.88--0.89), the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score by 6.64 points (95% CI -8.88--4.40) and the nasal congestion/obstruction score by 0.84 points (95% CI -1.13--0.54). Heterogeneity across biologic classes varied by outcome, ranging from low to substantial. Overall, biologics exhibited a favourable safety profile.
CONCLUSIONS
Biologics significantly reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function, asthma control and quality of life, and alleviated sino-nasal outcomes in patients with comorbid asthma and CRSwNP, with an acceptable safety profile.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.