DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.12.015
Neurocognitive evidence for revision of treatment targets and guidelines for phenylketonuria.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To compare the neurocognitive outcomes of patients with phenylketonuria (PKU) to determine whether decreasing phenylalanine (Phe) levels to <240 is preferable to the use of 360 μmol/L as an upper-target Phe level. An additional aim was to establish the influence of biochemical indices other than Phe on neurocognitive outcomes.
STUDY
DESIGN
Patients with PKU (n = 63; mean age 10.8 ± 2.3 years) and healthy controls (n = 73; mean age 10.9 ± 2.2 years) performed computerized tasks measuring neurocognitive functions (inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and motor control). Lifetime and concurrent blood Phe levels, Phe-to-tyrosine ratio (Phe:Tyr), and Phe variations were examined in relation to neurocognitive outcomes using nonparametric tests and regression analyses.
RESULTS
Patients with PKU with Phe levels ≤240 μmol/L and healthy controls performed equally well. Patients with Phe levels between 240 and 360 μmol/L and ≥360 μmol/L performed more poorly than did controls across tasks. Patients with Phe levels ≤240 μmol/L performed significantly better than patients with levels between 240 and 360 μmol/L on tasks measuring inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility. Absolute Phe levels and Phe variation were the best predictors of motor control, whereas Phe:Tyr were the best predictors of inhibitory control.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study suggest that upper Phe targets should be lowered to optimize neurocognitive outcomes. Moreover, Phe variation and Phe:Tyr appear to be of additional value in treatment monitoring.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.