Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases · 2026
Use of the EOS 2D/3D Imaging System for the Evaluation of Calcinosis in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: A Retrospective Case Series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maguire Ciara A, Lawrence Carli N, Lala Shailee V, Pinkney Lynne P, Perfetto Jessica, Oza Vikash S, Kahn Philip J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a systemic autoimmune vasculopathy, which may be complicated by calcinosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. Calcinosis is often associated with pain, ulceration, infection, impaired mobility, and reduced quality of life, yet no gold standard exists for its detection and longitudinal monitoring. Current evaluation relies on clinical examination (history plus physical examination) with or without targeted conventional radiography, which may underestimate disease burden and expose children to cumulative doses of ionizing radiation. The EOS 2D/3D imaging system provides rapid, whole-body imaging with substantially reduced radiation exposure. Thus, we sought to explore its utility in assessing calcinosis in JDM.
METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we investigated NYU pediatric patients with JDM who underwent EOS imaging for evaluation of calcinosis. EOS images and conventional radiographs were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to clinical data, with a focus on the anatomic distribution of calcinosis.
RESULTS: Seven patients (5 female, 2 male, ages 10 to 17 years) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 6 underwent both EOS and x-ray imaging. EOS imaging accurately identified calcinosis of the trunk and lower extremities in all cases and detected calcinosis not previously appreciated on clinical examination or dedicated radiographs in every patient. In 2 patients, EOS imaging failed to detect all upper-extremity calcinosis, likely due to the use of standard orthopedic positioning.
CONCLUSIONS: EOS imaging appears to be a valid alternative to conventional radiography for evaluating calcinosis of the trunk and lower extremities in JDM, while offering the advantages of lower radiation exposure, rapid acquisition, and broader anatomic coverage. Development of JDM-specific positioning protocols may improve the detection of upper-extremity disease.
METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we investigated NYU pediatric patients with JDM who underwent EOS imaging for evaluation of calcinosis. EOS images and conventional radiographs were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists blinded to clinical data, with a focus on the anatomic distribution of calcinosis.
RESULTS: Seven patients (5 female, 2 male, ages 10 to 17 years) met the inclusion criteria, of whom 6 underwent both EOS and x-ray imaging. EOS imaging accurately identified calcinosis of the trunk and lower extremities in all cases and detected calcinosis not previously appreciated on clinical examination or dedicated radiographs in every patient. In 2 patients, EOS imaging failed to detect all upper-extremity calcinosis, likely due to the use of standard orthopedic positioning.
CONCLUSIONS: EOS imaging appears to be a valid alternative to conventional radiography for evaluating calcinosis of the trunk and lower extremities in JDM, while offering the advantages of lower radiation exposure, rapid acquisition, and broader anatomic coverage. Development of JDM-specific positioning protocols may improve the detection of upper-extremity disease.