MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.03.007

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of otolaryngology · 2008

Endoscopic sialolith removal: orientation and shape as predictors of success.

Walvekar Rohan R, Carrau Ricardo L, Schaitkin Barry

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To identify factors that may influence successful retrieval of salivary stones with interventional sialendoscopy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of sialendoscopy procedures performed in the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of Pittsburgh from July 2005 to August 2007 was conducted. We identified thirty consecutive cases of sialolithiasis treated with sialendoscopy.

RESULTS

The mean age at presentation was 45 years (range, 7-77 years) with a male-to-female sex ratio of 1:1.5. The most common presentation was recurrent or persistent salivary gland swelling (53%), followed by salivary gland swelling associated with meals (37%). All these procedures were performed under sedation or general anesthesia. Size of the stones ranged from 0.2 to 1.2 cm. Our success rate for their endoscopic removal was 74% (14/19). Four patients (4/30) required a planned combined technique for stone removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Sialendoscopy is a reasonable minimally invasive option to treat sialolithiasis that avoids the need for salivary gland excision. Salivary stones larger than 4 mm for submandibular cases and 3 mm for parotid cases may be amenable to endoscopic removal provided their largest dimension is orientated favorably along the length of the duct.

Для цитирования: Walvekar Rohan R, Carrau Ricardo L, Schaitkin Barry. Endoscopic sialolith removal: orientation and shape as predictors of success.. American journal of otolaryngology. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.03.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.