Epidemiology of non-travel enteric fever cases in England: insights from 10 years of surveillance.

OBJECTIVES

In non-endemic countries, surveillance of non-travel cases of enteric fever is important to identify carriers and reduce secondary transmission. We characterised these cases in England between 2012 and 2021 and assessed potential sources of infection to inform guidance revision.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective case-case.

METHODS

We identified enteric fever cases from the national surveillance dataset. Non-travel cases were defined as no travel to an endemic country or travel but onset of >60 days after return. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with non-travel cases. We reviewed the case records of cases with unknown source of infection.

RESULTS

Compared to travel cases, non-travel cases (7%; 225/3075) were older (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.04), asymptomatic (OR = 9.3: 95% CI: 4.3-20.3), and confirmed with Salmonella typhi infection (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.26-2.4). Non-travel cases had lower odds of being of Indian (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.16-0.45) or Pakistani ethnicity (OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.16-0.45) than White British. Surveillance questionnaires identified a possible infection source for 53%: case records review identified a further 23%: 33% secondary transmission, mostly household; 21% had overseas visitors, or travelling family; 12% were carriers (cases with enteric fever in the past), 12% travelled to endemic country outside of the 60-day window, and 22% had other possible sources. Case records differentiated between travel 60-90 days (5%) vs travel years prior to onset (7%), suggesting carrier status.

CONCLUSION

Not all possible carriers were identified through the surveillance questionnaire. Therefore, we recommend additional questions to systematically capture travel history beyond 60 days to assist in classifying carrier status and to updating the source of infection.