Physiotherapy theory and practice · 2021
Effects of sensory cues on dynamic trunk control in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khumlee Nalin, Suriyaamarit Duangporn, Boonyong Sujitra
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence whether the combined visual and verbal cues could improve dynamic trunk control in the sitting position in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (SDCP).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the immediate effects of visual, verbal, and combined visual and verbal cues on dynamic trunk control in the sitting position in children with and without SDCP. Methods:Twenty children with SDCP and 20 typically developing (TD) children aged eight to 12 years in sitting positions maneuvered their trunks to lean forward, backward, to the left, and to the right under conditions of no sensory cues, visual cues, verbal cues, and combined visual and verbal cues. Dynamic trunk control in the sitting position was assessed using the center of force (CoF) trajectory and limit of stability (LOS).
RESULTS: Verbal cues and combined visual and verbal cues could improve CoF trajectories in the forward, backward, and leftward directions in TD children and children with SDCP. Combined visual and verbal cues could improve the LOS in both groups.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that combined visual and verbal cues are more effective at enhancing dynamic trunk control than either visual or verbal cues alone in TD children and children with SDCP.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the immediate effects of visual, verbal, and combined visual and verbal cues on dynamic trunk control in the sitting position in children with and without SDCP. Methods:Twenty children with SDCP and 20 typically developing (TD) children aged eight to 12 years in sitting positions maneuvered their trunks to lean forward, backward, to the left, and to the right under conditions of no sensory cues, visual cues, verbal cues, and combined visual and verbal cues. Dynamic trunk control in the sitting position was assessed using the center of force (CoF) trajectory and limit of stability (LOS).
RESULTS: Verbal cues and combined visual and verbal cues could improve CoF trajectories in the forward, backward, and leftward directions in TD children and children with SDCP. Combined visual and verbal cues could improve the LOS in both groups.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that combined visual and verbal cues are more effective at enhancing dynamic trunk control than either visual or verbal cues alone in TD children and children with SDCP.