European journal of clinical investigation · 2007
Hypoxanthine decreases equilibrative type of adenosine transport in lymphocytes from Lesch-Nyhan patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Prior C, Torres R J, Puig J G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lesch-Nyhan (LN) syndrome is associated with deficient hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) activity, but the connection between the aberrant purine metabolism and the neurological symptoms remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine adenosine transporter subtypes affected by HPRT deficiency and by the associated hypoxanthine excess.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nucleoside transporter types (depending on their sodium dependence and 10 microm nitrobenzylthioinosine, NBTI, sensitivity) involved in adenosine transport were compared between peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) obtained from nine LN patients, PBL(LN) (2-21 years) and from nine controls, PBL(C) (2-23 years) under basal conditions and after 25 microm hypoxanthine incubation.
RESULTS: We found four types of adenosine transporters in PBL: equilibrative and concentrative transporters that are either sensitive (ENT1 or cs) or insensitive (ENT2 or ci) to NBTI. Adenosine ENT1 uptake was the predominant transporter in both PBL(C) (55%) and PBL(LN) (46%). Under basal conditions no significant differences were found in adenosine transport between PBL(C) and PBL(LN). Incubation of PBL with 25 microm hypoxanthine markedly decreased total adenosine transport in both cell types. Hypoxanthine affected equilibrative transport (mainly ENT2 type) in PBL(LN) and PBL(C). Only in PBL(C) was concentrative transport affected by hypoxanthine. Expressions of human (h) ENT1 and hENT2 mRNA were not significantly modified by hypoxanthine incubation in PBL(C).
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to further knowledge of the defective adenosine transport found in PBL(LN). Increased hypoxanthine levels, similar to those reported in HPRT deficient patients, reduced adenosine uptake by 32% in PBL(LN) as compared to normal transport.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nucleoside transporter types (depending on their sodium dependence and 10 microm nitrobenzylthioinosine, NBTI, sensitivity) involved in adenosine transport were compared between peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) obtained from nine LN patients, PBL(LN) (2-21 years) and from nine controls, PBL(C) (2-23 years) under basal conditions and after 25 microm hypoxanthine incubation.
RESULTS: We found four types of adenosine transporters in PBL: equilibrative and concentrative transporters that are either sensitive (ENT1 or cs) or insensitive (ENT2 or ci) to NBTI. Adenosine ENT1 uptake was the predominant transporter in both PBL(C) (55%) and PBL(LN) (46%). Under basal conditions no significant differences were found in adenosine transport between PBL(C) and PBL(LN). Incubation of PBL with 25 microm hypoxanthine markedly decreased total adenosine transport in both cell types. Hypoxanthine affected equilibrative transport (mainly ENT2 type) in PBL(LN) and PBL(C). Only in PBL(C) was concentrative transport affected by hypoxanthine. Expressions of human (h) ENT1 and hENT2 mRNA were not significantly modified by hypoxanthine incubation in PBL(C).
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to further knowledge of the defective adenosine transport found in PBL(LN). Increased hypoxanthine levels, similar to those reported in HPRT deficient patients, reduced adenosine uptake by 32% in PBL(LN) as compared to normal transport.