Identifying patterns of neurocognitive dysfunction through direct comparison of children with leukemia, central nervous system tumors, and sickle cell disease.

PURPOSE: To quantify and compare the magnitude and type of neurocognitive dysfunction in at-risk children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and sickle cell disease (SCD) using a common instrument and metric to directly compare these groups with each other.

METHODS

Fifty-three participants between the ages of 7 and 12 years (n = 27 ALL, n = 11 CNS tumor, n = 15 SCD) were enrolled and assessed using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTCB). Participants with ALL or CNS tumor were 0-18 months posttherapy, while participants with SCD possessed the SS or Sβ0 genotype, took hydroxyurea, and had no known history of stroke.

RESULTS

Independent sample t-tests showed that participants with ALL and CNS tumor experienced greatest deficits in processing speed (ALL d = -0.96; CNS tumor d = -1.2) and inhibitory control and attention (ALL d = -0.53; CNS tumor d = -0.97) when compared with NIHTCB normative data. Participants with SCD experienced deficits in cognitive flexibility only (d = -0.53). Episodic memory was relatively spared in all groups (d = -0.03 to -0.32). There were no significant differences in function when groups were compared directly with each other by analysis of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a common metric to quantify the magnitude and type of neurocognitive dysfunction across at-risk groups of participants by disease shows that participants perform below age-expected norms in multiple domains and experience dysfunction differently than one another. This approach highlights patterns of dysfunction that can inform disease- and domain-specific interventions.