Affect integration, metacognitions, and early maladaptive schemas as predictors of outcome in cognitive and metacognitive therapies for social anxiety disorder.

OBJECTIVE

Few reliable patient characteristics have emerged as significant predictors of outcomes for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). This study aimed to explore whether affect integration, metacognitions, and maladaptive schemas could serve as predictors of therapeutic outcomes for patients with SAD. Relationships between these psychological constructs and baseline SAD symptomatology were also examined.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients across three sites participated in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) or Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) for SAD in inpatient or outpatient clinics. Measures of predictors and SAD symptomatology were repeatedly assessed. Statistical analyses included longitudinal, multilevel modeling.

RESULTS

Difficulties with affect integration, metacognitions and early maladaptive schemas clearly related to higher levels of SAD symptoms at baseline but were not generally predictive of changes in SAD symptoms during therapy. However, examining sub-domains revealed that difficulties with the integration of jealousy and tenderness, and the maladaptive schema of defectiveness/shame, predicted poorer outcomes. In contrast, initial difficulties with the integration of sadness, a greater lack of cognitive confidence, and the maladaptive schema of dependence/incompetence were associated with greater symptom improvement.

CONCLUSION

Identifying issues of affect integration and core self-other beliefs prior to therapy may enhance patient selection and allow for a more individualized treatment.