MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.17796/jcpd.37.4.l3176v7602558853

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2013

Determining treatibility of primary teeth with pulpal exposure.

Doğan S, Durutürk L, Orhan A I, Batmaz I

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine rates of pulpal exposure during caries removal with an excavator or a bur, to assess success rates of vital pulp therapies in both cases, to analyze pulpal bleeding as an indicator of primary teeth treatability.

STUDY

DESIGN

Of the 352 primary mandibular molars with deep carious lesions, 141 with pulp exposed during the removal of caries were grouped according to type of instrument causing pulpal exposure and existence of bleeding at the exposure site. Teeth suitable for direct pulp capping or formocresol pulpotomy were treated and followed up for two years.

RESULTS

The difference between the rates of pulpal exposure with an excavator (52.5%) or a bur (47.5%) was insignificant. The treatment success rate of teeth with pulp exposed by an excavator (15.8%) was significantly lower than teeth with pulp exposed by a bur (48.8%), regardless of whether bleeding existed at the exposure site or not; however when bleeding existed, this difference was insignificant (15.8% and 40.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulpal exposure possibility during caries removal caused by an excavator and a bur was similar the treatment success rate was lower when the exposure was caused by an excavator the existence of pulpal bleeding resulted in mistakes in diagnoses.

Для цитирования: Doğan S, Durutürk L, Orhan A I, Batmaz I. Determining treatibility of primary teeth with pulpal exposure.. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2013. DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.4.l3176v7602558853.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.