DOI 10.1016/j.expneurol.2026.115990
Contralesional cTBS promotes motor function by enhancing synaptic plasticity and axonal remodeling via TGF-β/Smad3/Foxp3 signaling axis in ischemic stroke rats.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS), an emerging therapeutic neuromodulation strategy, has shown promise in improving stroke recovery. However, the mechanisms of ICMS in promoting neurological restoration remain elusive.
METHODS
We assessed motor dysfunction in middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion (MCAO/R) rats following 3-week contralesional intermittent versus continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS vs. cTBS) in the subacute phase. Subsequently, we evaluated cTBS efficacy with or without TGF-β1 inhibitor (SB431542). We investigated structural and molecular alterations via RNA sequencing, magnetic resonance imaging, in-vivo electrophysiology, anterograde viral tract tracing, and histological methods.
RESULTS
Contralesional cTBS significantly ameliorated MCAO/R-induced motor and structural deficits, which may depend on the TGF-β signaling and myelination pathways as confirmed by RNA sequencing. cTBS significantly increased the expressions of proteins such as MBP, PSD-95, SYN, pro-BDNF in the peri-infarct region and enhanced axonal fiber density as assessed by confocal images. Further results revealed that cTBS effectively shifted the neuro-inflammatory balance by elevating IL-10 and restraining pro-inflammatory IL-17 in the peri-infarct cortex via activating the TGF-β/Smad3/Foxp3 axis. TGF-β1 inhibition (SB431542) significantly reversed the behavioral and synaptic plasticity improvements following cTBS treatment.
CONCLUSION
Contralesional cTBS could promote motor recovery by enhancing neuroplasticity and axonal remodeling via the TGF-β/Smad3/Foxp3 pathway.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.