Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
Crystalline Lens Shape During Accommodation in Children.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pradhan Asik, Hughes Rohan P J, Woodman-Pieterse Emily C, Vincent Stephen J, Read Scott A, Atchison David A, Carkeet Andrew
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine how accommodation affects lens shape in myopic and non-myopic children.
METHODS: Participants included 76 non-myopic (spherical equivalent refraction (SER): 0.00 to +1.75 D) and 18 myopic children (SER = -3.50 to -0.75 D) aged 5-12 years. Anterior and posterior lens surface shapes were determined by image processing and ray tracing of IOLMaster 700-generated B-scan images (six meridians per scan) at 0, 3, 6 and 9 D accommodation demands, expressed as refractive power vectors (M, J0 and J45).
RESULTS: For all children, anterior and posterior lens surface M and total lens power increased by means (±SD) of +0.45 ± 0.17, +0.23 ± 0.20 and +0.65 ± 0.32 D per dioptre of accommodation demand, respectively, with a shift towards a more equiconvex shape with increasing accommodation. J0 and J45 did not change significantly during accommodation (for anterior surface, p = 0.68 and 0.48, respectively; for posterior surface, p = 0.47 and 0.88, respectively). Myopic lenses had significantly lower anterior and posterior surface M and total lens power than non-myopic lenses (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were observed in astigmatic vectors except for anterior lens surface J0. There were no interactions between accommodation demand and refractive error for any lens parameters (all p ≥ 0.13).
CONCLUSION: Myopic children have flatter lens surfaces than non-myopic children. Lens surface shape changes with accommodation are similar between myopic and non-myopic children.
METHODS: Participants included 76 non-myopic (spherical equivalent refraction (SER): 0.00 to +1.75 D) and 18 myopic children (SER = -3.50 to -0.75 D) aged 5-12 years. Anterior and posterior lens surface shapes were determined by image processing and ray tracing of IOLMaster 700-generated B-scan images (six meridians per scan) at 0, 3, 6 and 9 D accommodation demands, expressed as refractive power vectors (M, J0 and J45).
RESULTS: For all children, anterior and posterior lens surface M and total lens power increased by means (±SD) of +0.45 ± 0.17, +0.23 ± 0.20 and +0.65 ± 0.32 D per dioptre of accommodation demand, respectively, with a shift towards a more equiconvex shape with increasing accommodation. J0 and J45 did not change significantly during accommodation (for anterior surface, p = 0.68 and 0.48, respectively; for posterior surface, p = 0.47 and 0.88, respectively). Myopic lenses had significantly lower anterior and posterior surface M and total lens power than non-myopic lenses (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were observed in astigmatic vectors except for anterior lens surface J0. There were no interactions between accommodation demand and refractive error for any lens parameters (all p ≥ 0.13).
CONCLUSION: Myopic children have flatter lens surfaces than non-myopic children. Lens surface shape changes with accommodation are similar between myopic and non-myopic children.