Medical law review · 2019
Did Bioethics Matter? A History of Autonomy, Consent, and Intersex Genital Surgery.
Историческая статьяСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reis Elizabeth
Аннотация
This article argues that the rise of bioethics in the post-WWII era and the emergence of the legal doctrine of informed consent in the late 1950s should have had a greater impact on patients with intersex traits (atypical sex development) than they did, given their emphasis on respect for autonomy and beneficence toward patients. Instead, these progressive trends collided with a turn in intersex management toward infants, who were unable to provide autonomous consent about their medical care. Patient autonomy took a back seat as parents heeded physicians' advice in an environment even more hierarchical than we know today. Intersex care of both infants and adults continues to need improvement. It remains an open question whether the abstract ideals of bioethics-respect, patient autonomy, and the requirement of informed consent-are alone adequate to secure that improvement, or whether legal actions (or the threat of litigation) or some other reforms will be required to effect such change.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBioethicsChildDecision MakingDisorders of Sex DevelopmentFemaleGender IdentityHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHistory, 20th CenturyHuman RightsHumansInfantInfant HealthInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedParental ConsentPersonal AutonomyPhysiciansGender-Affirming SurgeryUnnecessary ProceduresYoung Adult