Drug-Induced sleep endoscopy in children: NAVOTEL scoring system development.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Pediatric drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) lacks a universal and easy-to-use scoring system. The velum, oropharynx, tongue, epiglottis (VOTE) scoring system is widely used but needs to be completed in pediatrics. The main objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of obstructive sites in DISE and to propose an appropriate pediatric scoring system. The secondary objective was to evaluate the changes in surgical management induced by the proposed scoring system.
METHODS
A single-center prospective 5-year study was conducted from March 2016 to December 2021, including 99 children with a mean age of 7.2 years (±3.7), with pathological preoperative sleep recordings and undergoing DISE. The distribution of all upper airway obstructive sites was studied.
RESULTS
Adenoids (A) were the most frequent obstructive site (63% of patients), and the nasal cavities (N) and the larynx (L) were other frequent obstructive sites. These sites are not explored by the VOTE scoring system, leading to the creation of the nose, adenoids, velum, oropharynx, tongue, epiglottis, larynx (NAVOTEL) scoring system. NAVOTEL was significantly correlated with the severity of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAS) (ρ = 0.2; p = 0.04) and highlighted obstructive sites in 6/9 patients with VOTE = 0. Of these patients, 4 had a complete obstructive site, and 3 had a multisite obstruction. VOTE indicated 8 additional surgical actions; NAVOTEL indicated 50 other actions compared to clinical examination. The NAVOTEL scoring system was exhaustive regarding surgical indications for OSAS.
CONCLUSIONS
The NAVOTEL scoring system is exhaustive in pediatric DISE and correlated to OSAS severity. It should be preferred in pediatric DISE.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.