Brain injury · 2022
Convergent validity of the child behavior checklist sleep items in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lah Suncica, Bogdanov Stefan, Brookes Naomi, Epps Adrienne, Teng Arthur, Ocampo Isabella Maria Beatrice, Naismith Sharon
Аннотация
AIM: The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) includes several sleep items. We aimed to examine the convergent validity of CBCL sleep scores with validated sleep measures, and to explore their functional correlates.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 44 children with moderate to severe TBI, aged 6-15 years. Parents completed the CBCL and Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), and children wore actigraphy watches.
RESULTS: We found significant, albeit differential, associations between CBCL and SDSC sleep scores. Specifically: (i) "trouble sleeping" with SDSC total score, (ii) "trouble sleeping" and "nightmares" with SDSC initiating and maintaining sleep, (iii) "talks/walks in sleep" with SDSC arousal, and (iv) "overtired," "sleeps more" and CBCL sleep composite with SDSC excessive somnolence. The CBCL item "sleeps less" was the only significant predictor of functioning; children who slept less had lower social competence. No associations were found between CBCL sleep scores and actigraphy.
CONCLUSIONS: The CBCL does not provide a comprehensive assessment of sleep disturbances in children with moderate to severe TBI. Nevertheless, certain CBCL sleep items demonstrate initial convergent validity with subscales of the SDSC assessing select types of sleep disturbances. The CBCL may be useful in research and clinical situations when administration of more comprehensive assessment sleep tools is not viable.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 44 children with moderate to severe TBI, aged 6-15 years. Parents completed the CBCL and Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC), and children wore actigraphy watches.
RESULTS: We found significant, albeit differential, associations between CBCL and SDSC sleep scores. Specifically: (i) "trouble sleeping" with SDSC total score, (ii) "trouble sleeping" and "nightmares" with SDSC initiating and maintaining sleep, (iii) "talks/walks in sleep" with SDSC arousal, and (iv) "overtired," "sleeps more" and CBCL sleep composite with SDSC excessive somnolence. The CBCL item "sleeps less" was the only significant predictor of functioning; children who slept less had lower social competence. No associations were found between CBCL sleep scores and actigraphy.
CONCLUSIONS: The CBCL does not provide a comprehensive assessment of sleep disturbances in children with moderate to severe TBI. Nevertheless, certain CBCL sleep items demonstrate initial convergent validity with subscales of the SDSC assessing select types of sleep disturbances. The CBCL may be useful in research and clinical situations when administration of more comprehensive assessment sleep tools is not viable.