Parent-child concordance on reported barriers to helmet use by children.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
We determined the agreement between parents and their school-age children on reported barriers to bicycle helmet use.
MATERIAL/
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a 2-county Central Texas region with no helmet use legislation. Parent-child pairs, selected through a randomized, multi-stage sampling procedure and pre-matched by unique identifiers, were surveyed independently with self-administered questionnaires. Parent-child concordance was assessed using Kappa statistic.
RESULTS
Of 1,987 surveys distributed, children returned 1,203 (61%) while parents returned 636 (53% of child respondents). Parents included 31% college graduates and 33% reported annual income of >55,000 dollars. Children included 60% whites, 16% blacks, and 16% Hispanics. The most popular reasons cited by children as barriers to helmet use were not having one (34%), being a safe rider (31%), and helmets messing up hair (18%). Good concordance was found on reported child bicycle riding (parent=88.0% vs. child=88.0%; K=0.64) and child helmet use the last time child rode a bicycle (parent=25.1% vs. child=28.0%; K=0.54). While good concordance was also found for reported helmet ownership (parent=31.9% vs. child=29.9%; K= 0.50), poor concordance was found for other barriers to helmet use including helmets looking ugly (parent=6.5% vs. child=13.4%; K=0.38) and messing up hair (parent=5.6% vs. child=15.2%; K=0.36).
CONCLUSIONS
Although parents may be generally aware of their children's bicycle riding and helmet use habits, they may not be fully aware of the reasons why their children may not use a helmet. Public education and interventions on helmet promotion need to focus on parents.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.