Are There Morphophysiological Airway Alterations in Syndromic Craniosynostosis? A 3D Computed Tomography and CFD Analysis.
Аннотация
ObjectivesCharacterize the upper airways (UAW) in individuals with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) using computed tomography scans and correlate with the airflow dynamics and craniofacial pattern.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study.SettingTertiary craniofacial center.IndividualsTwenty-nine individuals were included, divided in 2 groups: CON (n = 19; 21.2 ± 3.7 y), individuals with no craniofacial anomalies and no UAW morphological alterations, and SCS (n = 10; 22.1 ± 5.1 y) individuals with SCS prior to maxillomandibular surgery.InterventionsVolume (V, cm3) and minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA, mm2) was calculated (Mimics, Belgium). Computational fluid dynamics (ANSYS, EUA) was performed and flow (F, L/min), pressure (P, Pa), and resistance (R, Pa/[L/min]) were calculated. Cephalometric analysis (SNA[o]), ANB[o], Ba-S-N[o]) was also assessed (Dolphin Imaging, USA).Main OutcomeThe morphophysiology of the UAW in SCS individuals was severely impaired compared with the CON group.ResultsThe SCS group exhibited significant volumetric reduction in the total UAW (-29%), nasal cavity (-21%), and pharynx (-37%) compared with the CON group. The mCSA was 57% smaller in the SCS group. CFD simulations demonstrated decreased flow (-9%), increased pressure (136%), and resistance (156%) in the SCS group. UAW resistance presented a strong positive correlation with mCSA (CON: r = 0.77 / SCS: r = 0.88). Cephalometric findings revealed significant differences between CON and SCS, with the SCS group exhibiting values outside the normal range.ConclusionThe UAW of individuals with SCS was anatomically and functionally impaired, suggesting a significant risk for obstructive sleep apnea.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.