Scientific reports · 2022
Brain tumor classification based on neural architecture search.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chitnis Shubham, Hosseini Ramtin, Xie Pengtao
Аннотация
Brain tumor is a life-threatening disease and causes about 0.25 million deaths worldwide in 2020. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is frequently used for diagnosing brain tumors. In medically underdeveloped regions, physicians who can accurately diagnose and assess the severity of brain tumors from MRI are highly lacking. Deep learning methods have been developed to assist physicians in detecting brain tumors from MRI and determining their subtypes. In existing methods, neural architectures are manually designed by human experts, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address this problem, we propose to automatically search for high-performance neural architectures for classifying brain tumors from MRIs, by leveraging a Learning-by-Self-Explanation (LeaSE) architecture search method. LeaSE consists of an explainer model and an audience model. The explainer aims at searching for a highly performant architecture by encouraging the architecture to generate high-fidelity explanations of prediction outcomes, where explanations' fidelity is evaluated by the audience model. LeaSE is formulated as a four-level optimization problem involving a sequence of four learning stages which are conducted end-to-end. We apply LeaSE for MRI-based brain tumor classification, including four classes: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor, and healthy, on a dataset containing 3264 MRI images. Results show that our method can search for neural architectures that achieve better classification accuracy than manually designed deep neural networks while having fewer model parameters. For example, our method achieves a test accuracy of 90.6% and an AUC of 95.6% with 3.75M parameters while the accuracy and AUC of a human-designed network-ResNet101-is 84.5% and 90.1% respectively with 42.56M parameters. In addition, our method outperforms state-of-the-art neural architecture search methods.