MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/107110079501600710

Медицинская библиотека · Foot & ankle international · 1995

Retrograde intramedullary nailing for ankle arthrodesis.

Moore T J, Prince R, Pochatko D, Smith J W, Fleming S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This is a retrospective study of retrograde intramedullary rodding for ankle arthrodesis in 19 ankles in 16 patients. The preoperative diagnosis of 16 patients was diabetic neuropathic arthropathy in seven patients, rheumatoid arthritis in three patients, post traumatic arthrosis in three patients, paraplegia with fixed equinovarus of the foot in two patients, and avascular necrosis of the talus in one patient. Retrograde intramedullary rodding for ankle arthrodesis was done as a salvage procedure in each patient. Fourteen of the 19 ankles had radiographic evidence of solid arthrodesis. In the four patients with five ankles with pseudarthrosis, no case was clinically significant. There was one deep infection and one broken rod. Thirteen of the 16 patients are ambulatory, and nine required either an ankle-foot orthosis or shoe modification. The standard method of ankle fusion using crossed cancellous screws is the procedure of choice because it preserves the subtalar joint. Retrograde intramedullary rodding for ankle arthrodesis should be considered for patients with significant posttraumatic arthrosis and bone loss following distal tibial plafond fractures, concomitant subtalar arthrosis, severe osteopenia, such as in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, or neuropathic arthropathy.

Для цитирования: Moore T J, Prince R, Pochatko D, Smith J W, Fleming S. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for ankle arthrodesis.. Foot & ankle international. 1995. DOI: 10.1177/107110079501600710.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.