m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
BMC oral health · 2026

The interrelationship of TMJ morphology, craniofacial structure, and airway dimensions in patients with disc displacement.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Osama Almustafa, Zhang Hai Juan, Musa Mazen, Nasih Mahmoud, Zheng Cheng Dong, Ren Yu Han, Wang Shuang

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to comprehensively analyse the interrelationships between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology, craniofacial skeletal patterns, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions in patients with TMJ disc displacement (TMJ DD). METHODOLOGY: Based on the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and subsequent MRI confirmation, this retrospective study included 91 adult patients with TMD DD. These patients were then categorized into three groups.: Bilateral Normal disc position (BN, n = 36), Disc Displacement with Reduction (DDR, n = 25), and Disc Displacement without Reduction (DDWR, n = 30). All participants underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and cephalometric analysis of craniofacial structure and three-dimensional assessment of TMJ morphology (including joint spaces, fossa dimensions, and condylar inclination) and oropharyngeal airway volume (OPV) and area (OPA). Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis tests for group comparisons, Spearman's correlation to assess bivariate relationships, and multiple linear regression (MLR) to identify independent predictors of airway dimensions while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in craniofacial, TMJ characteristics, and oropharyngeal airway dimensions among the groups. The DDWR group exhibited a retrognathic and hyperdivergent skeletal pattern (larger ANB, smaller SNB, higher FMA; p < 0.05). The DDR group demonstrated a significantly steeper anterior condylar inclination and a more posteriorly positioned condyle. Crucially, oropharyngeal dimensions were significantly smaller in the DDR group compared to the BN group (OPV: 7688.56 ± 1770.14 mm3 vs. 10,562.47 ± 4185.89 mm3, p = 0.029; OPA: 410.76 ± 77.65 mm2 vs. 513.44 ± 145.21 mm2, p = 0.018). Correlation and MLR analyses revealed that a constricted airway was associated with mandibular retrognathism, specific TMJ features, and reduced vertical facial dimensions. Notably, glenoid fossa height was a significant positive predictor for both OPV and OPA. CONCLUSIONS: TMJ DD is associated with specific craniofacial patterns and reduced oropharyngeal airway dimensions. These findings underscore a significant association within the TMJ-craniofacial-airway complex, advocating for an integrated clinical approach in diagnosing and treating temporomandibular disorders and airway compromise.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты