Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have better functional and working ability but poorer general health and higher comorbidity rates today than in the late 1990s.

OBJECTIVES: Better treatment strategies and therapeutic options have changed the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the past decade. Our objective was to examine clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with RA treated in 1998-99 and 2011-12.

METHOD: The cross-sectional observational study included 303 consecutive outpatients (n = 103 in 1998-99 and n = 200 in 2011-12) from the same outpatient clinic. Patient questionnaires included patients' sociodemographics, the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) for functional ability, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), self-reported general health (GH), and operations performed due to RA. A clinical examination was conducted for all patients. Comorbidities according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), anti-rheumatic drugs and medications were recorded and the HAQ and NHP dimensions calculated. The results from these two patient cohorts were compared.

RESULTS: The cohorts were comparable with regard to age, sex, and RA duration while the patients in the 2011-12 cohort were less often seropositive for rheumatoid factor (RF), had a better socioeconomic situation, better functional and working ability, and a decreased rate of RA surgery. The patients in 2011-12 had higher comorbidities and poorer GH while the HRQoL dimensions did not differ between the cohorts except for better mobility in 2011-12. Methotrexate (MTX) and combinations of conventional anti-rheumatic drugs were more frequently used in 2011-12. Biologicals were used only in 2011-12.

CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, more active anti-rheumatic therapy coincides with better RA-related outcomes. However, the result was the opposite with regard to overall health and comorbidities. Is this a new challenge in the treatment RA?