MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754017

Медицинская библиотека · Radiology · 1995

Uncomplicated cat-scratch disease: findings at CT, MR imaging, and radiography.

Dong P R, Seeger L L, Yao L, Panosian C B, Johnson B L, Eckardt J J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the epidemiologic, clinical, and imaging features of cat-scratch disease (CSD) to facilitate prompt recognition and noninvasive diagnosis of this condition.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Eight otherwise healthy patients with pet cats presented with the subacute onset of epitrochlear, axillary, or groin masses. All underwent cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) (n = 1) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n = 7). Five patients underwent radiography of the elbow.

RESULTS

In all patients, MR imaging and CT showed a poorly defined soft-tissue mass with extensive surrounding edema in an efferent lymphatic distribution. Radiography revealed only soft-tissue edema in two patients and an ill-defined soft-tissue mass with soft-tissue edema in three patients. Six patients underwent biopsy; the findings of all pathologic specimens supported the diagnosis of CSD. No patients underwent serologic evaluation. All patients were asymptomatic within 4 weeks of beginning antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

CSD should be considered in all patients with upper extremity or head and neck adenopathy and a history of cat exposure. Although generally not required for diagnosis, cross-sectional imaging will reveal a mass with surrounding edema in an area of lymphatic drainage.

Для цитирования: Dong P R, Seeger L L, Yao L, Panosian C B, Johnson B L, Eckardt J J. Uncomplicated cat-scratch disease: findings at CT, MR imaging, and radiography.. Radiology. 1995. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.