Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2012
Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor: radiographic evaluation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chindasombatjaroen Jira, Poomsawat Sopee, Kakimoto Naoya, Shimamoto Hiroaki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the radiographic features of calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors (CCOTs) and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors (AOTs) and to compare the radiographic findings for these 2 lesions.
STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed radiographs of CCOTs and AOTs. Location, border, relationship of the lesion with the impacted tooth, calcification patterns, tooth displacement, and root resorption were evaluated.
RESULTS: Nine CCOTs and 8 AOTs were reviewed. Most CCOTs and AOTs had smooth borders. Three CCOTs and 7 AOTs enclosed impacted teeth. Of these cases, the radiolucencies of 3 CCOTs and 1 AOT were attached to the impacted teeth at the cementoenamel junctions. Three AOTs enclosed more portions of the roots, and the other 3 AOTs enclosed the entire teeth. Calcification in CCOTs appeared as a thin radiopaque line (2 cases) and discrete radiopaque foci (1 case), whereas AOTs had numerous dispersed or clustered radiopaque foci (4 cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Radiolucency with numerous radiopaque foci (particularly when the radiolucency surrounds a portion of the root or entire tooth) is suggestive of an AOT rather than a CCOT.
STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed radiographs of CCOTs and AOTs. Location, border, relationship of the lesion with the impacted tooth, calcification patterns, tooth displacement, and root resorption were evaluated.
RESULTS: Nine CCOTs and 8 AOTs were reviewed. Most CCOTs and AOTs had smooth borders. Three CCOTs and 7 AOTs enclosed impacted teeth. Of these cases, the radiolucencies of 3 CCOTs and 1 AOT were attached to the impacted teeth at the cementoenamel junctions. Three AOTs enclosed more portions of the roots, and the other 3 AOTs enclosed the entire teeth. Calcification in CCOTs appeared as a thin radiopaque line (2 cases) and discrete radiopaque foci (1 case), whereas AOTs had numerous dispersed or clustered radiopaque foci (4 cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Radiolucency with numerous radiopaque foci (particularly when the radiolucency surrounds a portion of the root or entire tooth) is suggestive of an AOT rather than a CCOT.