Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica · 2025
Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Pectus Carinatum Body Image Quality of Life Questionnaire (PeCBI-QOL) into Spanish.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Redondo Sedano J V, Gómez Sánchez A, García-Tabernero Hernández V A, Martín-Arriscado Arroba C, Gómez Fraile A, Delgado Muñoz M D
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The primary objective was to conduct the translation and subsequent transcultural adaptation into Spanish of the Pectus Carinatum Body Image Quality of Life questionnaire (PeCBI-QOL), designed to assess Pectus Carinatum (PC)'s quality of life impact.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A translation and transcultural adaptation process was carried out according to WHO guidelines. The process consisted of the following steps: direct translation, Delphi pilot study, retro-translation, cognitive survey to patients, and analysis/validation.
RESULTS: 42 patients and their respective caregivers replied to the validation questionnaire. Principal component factor analysis of the patient questionnaire showed a 4-factor solution, whereas in the caregiver questionnaire, it showed a 3-factor one. The questionnaires demonstrated good reliability, with internal consistency alpha coefficients of 0.78 and 0.85, respectively. The subscale-based concordance analysis also revealed good results in terms of reliability, except for the Motivation/treatment adhesion subscale in the patient questionnaire.
CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the PeCBI-QOL questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing PC's impact on patients' body image and quality of life.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A translation and transcultural adaptation process was carried out according to WHO guidelines. The process consisted of the following steps: direct translation, Delphi pilot study, retro-translation, cognitive survey to patients, and analysis/validation.
RESULTS: 42 patients and their respective caregivers replied to the validation questionnaire. Principal component factor analysis of the patient questionnaire showed a 4-factor solution, whereas in the caregiver questionnaire, it showed a 3-factor one. The questionnaires demonstrated good reliability, with internal consistency alpha coefficients of 0.78 and 0.85, respectively. The subscale-based concordance analysis also revealed good results in terms of reliability, except for the Motivation/treatment adhesion subscale in the patient questionnaire.
CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the PeCBI-QOL questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing PC's impact on patients' body image and quality of life.