MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000137549.60694.63

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2005

Which is a better method for Perthes' disease: femoral varus or Salter osteotomy?

Kitakoji Takahiko, Hattori Tadashi, Kitoh Hiroshi, Katoh Mitsuyasu, Ishiguro Naoki

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: The optimum surgical treatment of patients with Perthes' disease has not been decided. We compared the clinical and radiographic results at skeletal maturity of the femoral varus osteotomy and the Salter innominate osteotomy for treatment of patients with Perthes' disease. Treatment in 46 patients was by femoral varus osteotomy and in 30 patients by Salter innominate osteotomy. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The clinical results were similar in the two groups except for scarring after surgery, which was more prominent in the femoral varus osteotomy group. There was no significant difference in the sphericity of the femoral head and congruity of the hip between the two groups. However, coverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum, the neck-shaft angle, and the articular-trochanteric distance were closer to normal in the Salter innominate osteotomy group. We think that the Salter innominate osteotomy is the better treatment for patients with Perthes' disease to decrease residual problems such as coxa vara, trochanteric prominence, poor acetabular coverage, and the surgical scar.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series-no, or historical control group).

Для цитирования: Kitakoji Takahiko, Hattori Tadashi, Kitoh Hiroshi, Katoh Mitsuyasu, Ishiguro Naoki. Which is a better method for Perthes' disease: femoral varus or Salter osteotomy?. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137549.60694.63.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.