Comparative evaluation of pinning and cast fixation vs. external fixation after lateral closing-wedge osteotomy for cubitus varus in children.

BACKGROUND

Cubitus varus has been regarded as a poor functional and cosmetic consequence of supracondylar humerus fracture in children. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and radiologic outcomes of cubitus varus treatments based on fixation methods: Kirschner (K)-wire and cast fixation or external fixation.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients with cubitus varus secondary to supracondylar fractures were retrospectively enrolled between October 2015 and December 2018. Following lateral closing-wedge osteotomy, those undergoing K-wire and cast fixation were included in group A (n = 21) and those who were treated with external fixation comprised group B (n = 19). We measured the bony union, elbow joint range of motion, and carrying angle. The clinical and radiographic results were assessed according to the Bellemore criteria.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, operation duration, union time, and postoperative elbow range of motion (P > .05). A significant difference was noted, however, in postoperative carrying angle and results according to Bellemore criteria in group B (P < .05). No nonunion, myositis ossificans, or neurovascular injury was found at follow-up in the 2 groups. In group A, revision surgery was needed for residual varus in 1 patient and lateral condylar prominence was found in 2 patients. In group B, a superficial pin-site infection occurred in 2 patients, who were treated successfully with oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Both K-wire and external fixation after lateral closing-wedge osteotomy are reliable and effective for the treatment of cubitus varus in children. Compared with the K-wire method, external fixation achieves better functional and cosmetic results with a shorter learning curve.