European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
How difficult is it to learn different steps of a cortical mastoidectomy?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lamtara Jesslyn Clarance, Wijewickrema Sudanthi, O'Leary Stephen, Gerard Jean-Marc
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: A clear understanding of the difficulty levels of different aspects of a surgery is required to effectively guide and assess trainees. This study investigated which steps of cortical mastoidectomy are most challenging for novice and intermediate surgeons, and how these performances align with expert opinions.
METHODS: Thirty participants were divided into three groups: 10 novices (medical students), 10 intermediates (surgical trainees), and 10 experts (consulting ENT surgeons). Each performed cortical mastoidectomy on 8 anatomically different temporal bone specimens on a virtual reality platform. A senior otologist evaluated the performance using the validated Melbourne Mastoidectomy Scale (MMS). Additionally, 10 consulting otologists who are involved in training surgeons completed a questionnaire on the difficulty level of teaching the MMS items. Statistical comparisons between the novice, intermediate, and expert groups were conducted for each MMS item and compared with expert opinions.
RESULTS: Novices performed well only on defining the mastoid and entering the antrum. Intermediate group struggled mainly on sigmoid sinus related tasks and preserving the semicircular canals. Experts identified structural identification and defining MacEwan's triangle as easier tasks, aligning with novice and intermediate performance. However, while experts perceived facial nerve related tasks and exposing middle fossa plate as the most difficult steps to teach, intermediate group performed comparably to experts on these.
CONCLUSIONS: The contradictory results between intermediate group performance and expert opinion may result from training that emphasises complex mastoidectomy skills, at the cost of seemingly easier skills. These findings can be used for targeted feedback, assessment and curriculum development.
METHODS: Thirty participants were divided into three groups: 10 novices (medical students), 10 intermediates (surgical trainees), and 10 experts (consulting ENT surgeons). Each performed cortical mastoidectomy on 8 anatomically different temporal bone specimens on a virtual reality platform. A senior otologist evaluated the performance using the validated Melbourne Mastoidectomy Scale (MMS). Additionally, 10 consulting otologists who are involved in training surgeons completed a questionnaire on the difficulty level of teaching the MMS items. Statistical comparisons between the novice, intermediate, and expert groups were conducted for each MMS item and compared with expert opinions.
RESULTS: Novices performed well only on defining the mastoid and entering the antrum. Intermediate group struggled mainly on sigmoid sinus related tasks and preserving the semicircular canals. Experts identified structural identification and defining MacEwan's triangle as easier tasks, aligning with novice and intermediate performance. However, while experts perceived facial nerve related tasks and exposing middle fossa plate as the most difficult steps to teach, intermediate group performed comparably to experts on these.
CONCLUSIONS: The contradictory results between intermediate group performance and expert opinion may result from training that emphasises complex mastoidectomy skills, at the cost of seemingly easier skills. These findings can be used for targeted feedback, assessment and curriculum development.