Impact of Tourniquet Type on Outcomes in ORIF of Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of utilizing a silicone ring tourniquet in relation to traditional pneumatic cuff tourniquets and scenarios without any tourniquet intervention. The tested hypothesis was that the clinical results could be increased after use of the silicone ring tourniquet.
METHODS
The study was monocentric and retrospective evaluation of collected data. Inclusion criterion was open reduction and internal fixation of a displaced distal radius fracture in pediatric population (6-12 years). The pneumatic tourniquet (PT) group involved 18 patients, the no tourniquet (NT) 19 patients and the silicon ring (SR) group 19 patients. All patients were followed for 6 months. Primary criterion was the VAS score at 1 day and 7 days postop. Secondary criteria were delay of discharge, time of surgery and occurrence of complications.
RESULTS
The VAS score in the first and seven day postop was respectively 3.8 ±1 and 2.0 ± 0.5 for the PT group, 3.5 ± 0.5 and 1.8 ± 0.2 for the NT group and 3.2 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.4 for the SR group without statistically significant differences (p>0.1). There was a non-significant higher rate of complication PT group, especially for skin complications and a higher time of surgery in the NT group.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed hypothesis was not validated, as there were no notable changes observed in the clinical outcomes. Additionally, the analysis of complications revealed no evidence of bias. However, the reduced incidence of skin complications may indicate a beneficial effect associated with the silicone ring tourniquet.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.